Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00195
Original file (BC 2014 00195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00195

					COUNSEL: 

		HEARING DESIRED: NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her former spouse’s records be corrected to show that she is the 
former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In a two-page brief, through counsel, the applicant contends the 
following: 

Her former spouse intended for her to be the SBP beneficiary 
from the date of their divorce on 18 May 99, to the date of his 
death.  Their divorce decree specifies that she is the 
beneficiary of the SBP.  

In May 99, her former spouse notified the Defense Finance 
Accounting Service (DFAS) of his election to change SBP spouse 
to former spouse coverage.  

The Board should consider her untimely application in the 
interest of justice because she did not discover the error until 
after the death of her former spouse. 

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of the 
deceased member’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty; DH Form 1947, Certificate of Death; 
AF Form 1581, SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage 
and divorce decree.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 May 99, both parties divorced and the divorce decree 
ordered the decedent to continue the applicant as the SBP 
beneficiary.  

According to the AF Form 1581 dated in 1999, the applicant’s 
date of birth is 3 Dec 45.

According to the former member’s death certificate dated 29 May 
13, he was not married at the time of his death.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  The decedent and the applicant 
were married on 18 Aug 70, and he elected spouse and child SBP 
coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Nov 79, 
retirement.  The youngest child lost eligibility in Aug 94.  

The applicant provided a copy of the AF Form 1581; however, 
DFAS-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) has no record of receipt of the form.  
The decedent did not request coverage for the applicant to be 
terminated following their divorce, indicative of his intent to 
maintain her as the eligible SBP beneficiary.  To deny the 
applicant’s request would deny an asset awarded to her by the 
court.  

SBP premiums continued to be deducted from the decedent’s 
retired pay until 1 Jul 10, when the paid up SBP provision 
became effective.  DFAS-CL records continued to erroneously 
reflect the applicant’s name as the eligible spouse beneficiary

On 22 May 13, the decedent died.  There is no evidence of Air 
Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, we 
recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect on 19 May 
99, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage 
based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former 
spouse beneficiary.  Approval should be contingent upon recovery 
of any applicable premiums.

The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 21 Mar 14, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date this office has not received a 
response.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case and find the applicant has not demonstrated 
that extraordinary circumstances exist that are required for 
this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP 
beneficiaries.  We note that DPFFF recommends approval; however, 
we have been advised by our Agency Legal Counsel that a 
potential exists for competing interests.  In cases involving 
competing interests, this Board has been advised not to consider 
such cases unless a court of competent jurisdiction has ruled in 
the case or remands the case to the Board to make a 
determination.  Therefore, we are precluded from granting the 
applicant the SBP benefit.  However, we would like to point out 
that if the former member’s heir(s) were to provide a notarized 
consent relinquishing the benefit, or to complete the Survivor 
Benefit Program – Release of Arrears of Pay (AOP) Affidavit, we 
would be willing to reconsider the applicant’s request.  
Otherwise, the applicant’s only recourse is to return to a court 
of competent jurisdiction to have the issue decided.  Therefore, 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00195 in Executive Session on 17 Feb 15 and 8 Jun 
15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Vice Chair
	Member
	Member







The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00195 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 13 Mar 14.
Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, Counsel, dated 22 Sep 14
Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBRA, dated 23 Sep 14.


4

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704

    Original file (BC 2014 00704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00338

    Original file (BC 2014 00338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). Second, we note that the divorce decree submitted by the applicant was not final, as it was not executed by both parties and the court. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676

    Original file (BC 2013 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouse’s Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03731

    Original file (BC 2013 03731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decedent elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 95 retirement. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant acknowledges the change to the advisory opinion to recommend the decedent’s record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03921

    Original file (BC 2013 03921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting relief. The parties divorced on 2 Dec 04, and in the Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the decedent agreed to pay SBP premiums currently in place for the benefit of the applicant. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON JUL 2 2 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket Number: BC-2013-03921 I have carefully reviewed the AFBMCR application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00712

    Original file (BC 2014 00712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A person's eligibility as an SBP spouse beneficiary terminates upon divorce; however, the law provides two mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. The court order awarded the applicant the SBP and DFAS-CL records continued to reflect the applicant’s name as the eligible spouse beneficiary and SBP premiums continued to be deducted from the member's retired pay until his 14 Oct 13 death. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...